Add Controversial Balance Changes in Tower Rush
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|||||||
|
<br>In any competitive multiplayer game, the development team walks a razor-thin tightrope when attempting to balance the roster of playable characters.<br>
|
||||||
|
<br>This article revisits some of the most controversial balance decisions in the history of the genre and the chaos they caused.<br>
|
||||||
|
Unintended Consequences
|
||||||
|
<br>Perhaps the most infamous example of a balance change gone wrong involved a massive, multi-stat buff to a splash-damage unit.<br>
|
||||||
|
<br>The developers were eventually forced to release an emergency 'hotfix' patch outside of their normal schedule to completely revert the changes.<br>
|
||||||
|
The 'Emergency Hotfix' is the ultimate admission of failure by the devs.Sometimes, developers 'kill' a card intentionally.Even if a card's win rate is exactly 50%, if the community hates playing against it, the devs will usually nerf it.
|
||||||
|
The Unstoppable Clone
|
||||||
|
<br>The 'Night Witch' release is the textbook example; a unit that spawned flying swarms upon death while dealing massive melee damage.<br>
|
||||||
|
<br>Players who unlocked her early went on massive, undefeated win streaks, causing outrage among the free-to-play community who couldn't access the card yet.<br>
|
||||||
|
Community ReactionThe FixTanking the RatingsUsually forces immediate communication from the lead developer apologizing and promising a rapid hotfixRefusing to PlayThe most effective way to force a change, as it hurts the game's viewership and public image directly
|
||||||
|
The Impossible Task of Perfect Balance
|
||||||
|
<br>These controversial patches, while frustrating at the time, are part of the game's rich history.<br>
|
||||||
|
<br>They give the community something to complain about, bond over, and eventually laugh at.<br>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Here's more information about [tower rush](https://www.internationalsystem.com.mx/read-blog/176_how-to-coordinate-with-teammates-in-2v2-tower-rush.html) have a look at the web site.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user